<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
	<channel>
		<title>Comments on: Is C++ still needed?</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/archives/2005/11/is-c-still-needed</link>
		<description>Gerd Riesselmann: Notes From the Bog-All Around Objects: C++, .NET, PHP, Design Patterns And More</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:57:43 +0200</pubDate>
		<generator>Drupal TotalFeeds Module</generator>
				
			<item>
		<title>Of course, there is always</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-3410</link>
		<description>Of course, there is always C++/CLI now for creating winforms using C++. This is assuming you can run Visual Studio 2005 on your system. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, there is always C++/CLI now for creating winforms using C++. This is assuming you can run Visual Studio 2005 on your system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:57:43 +0200</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-3410</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hi Gerd, thanks for the</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-3374</link>
		<description>Hi Gerd, thanks for the article! While it is not 100% true, there is a lot of value in it. One thing I would not agree is with the performance part, C++ is always faster than Java and C#. This is one of the reasons I abandoned Java many years ago (I like C# for its ease of development). Most probably the slow down in your test cases were due to some external factors not belonging to the C++ language itself (e.g. a slower 3rd party implementation of C++ database library that has not been optimized).

I do agree with other parts of the article like C++ development takes a lot more time than C#/Visual Basic. In my opinion, I don&#039;t think C++ will ever die off, it is here to stay. And that&#039;s the comforting thing to know because I still need C++ in many areas. Thanks again for sharing your view.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gerd, thanks for the article! While it is not 100% true, there is a lot of value in it. One thing I would not agree is with the performance part, C++ is always faster than Java and C#. This is one of the reasons I abandoned Java many years ago (I like C# for its ease of development). Most probably the slow down in your test cases were due to some external factors not belonging to the C++ language itself (e.g. a slower 3rd party implementation of C++ database library that has not been optimized).</p>
<p>I do agree with other parts of the article like C++ development takes a lot more time than C#/Visual Basic. In my opinion, I don't think C++ will ever die off, it is here to stay. And that's the comforting thing to know because I still need C++ in many areas. Thanks again for sharing your view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:46:00 +0200</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haywire Guy</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-3374</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>C++ is faster than C# and</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-769</link>
		<description>C++ is faster than C# and Java in almost every area.

C# is *NOT* faster for I/O by any stretch of the imagination, I have no idea where you came to such conclusions, but they are very false.

C# is faster for rapid application development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C++ is faster than C# and Java in almost every area.</p>
<p>C# is *NOT* faster for I/O by any stretch of the imagination, I have no idea where you came to such conclusions, but they are very false.</p>
<p>C# is faster for rapid application development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:33:55 +0200</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-769</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>As always in programming: it</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-156</link>
		<description>As always in programming: it depends. If you are doing a lot of math, C++ presumingly will be a good choice. But if you are doing a lot of I/O and string operations, C# may outperform C++. If you are doing large scale business applications like I do, the time needed to create instances in memory matters, since that&#039;s what the application does 90% of the time.

That&#039;s life: Difficult, manifold, and no certainties. 

Best wishes for your career in the sorting business, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always in programming: it depends. If you are doing a lot of math, C++ presumingly will be a good choice. But if you are doing a lot of I/O and string operations, C# may outperform C++. If you are doing large scale business applications like I do, the time needed to create instances in memory matters, since that's what the application does 90% of the time.</p>
<p>That's life: Difficult, manifold, and no certainties. </p>
<p>Best wishes for your career in the sorting business, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:28:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Riesselmann</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-156</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>C++ is slow?</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-155</link>
		<description>C++ is slow?
LOL
This is the worst-lie-shit i ever heard.
You&#039;ve compared only creating instances times?
Write simple sorting algorithm and test it with theese three languages and you will see that (in speed) C# and Java sux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C++ is slow?<br />
LOL<br />
This is the worst-lie-shit i ever heard.<br />
You've compared only creating instances times?<br />
Write simple sorting algorithm and test it with theese three languages and you will see that (in speed) C# and Java sux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:12:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominik</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-155</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>As long as the debates about</title>
		<link>http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-154</link>
		<description>As long as the debates about C++0x are going, I doubt we will see it in 200x. Maybe 2012, or so :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the debates about C++0x are going, I doubt we will see it in 200x. Maybe 2012, or so :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:08:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Riesselmann</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gerd-riesselmann.net/node/100%2523comment-154</guid>
							</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
	